Volume 5

Volume 5, Number 17

May 28, 2007

thumb
10 pages609 K bytes

Issue-Contingent Ethical Views—A Comparison Using Pathfinder Associative Networks


Jennifer Kreie
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA

Kerry Alt
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA

Timothy Paul Cronan
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA

Lori N. K. Leonard
University of Tulsa
Tulsa, OK 74104 USA

Abstract: This paper describes a study that compared how people viewed ethics within the context of different situations. Using Pathfinder associative network analysis, the researchers compared associative networks of three groups of subjects. Pathfinder provides a graphical representation and statistical measure of how people relate ethics terms. The results confirm past scenario-based research that found people’s judgment of what is ethical or unethical is situation-dependent. In addition, the use of Pathfinder associative networks introduced statistical measures and graphical representation of people’s view of ethical concepts which have not been used in IT and ethics research.

Keywords: ethics, IT and ethics, associative network, Pathfinder, semantic network, mental model

Download this issue:   ISEDJ.5(17).Kreie.pdf   (Adobe PDF, 10 pages, 609 K bytes)

Preview the contents:   Kreie.j.txt   (ASCII txt, 25 K bytes)


< class="style_left"p>Recommended Citation: Kreie, Alt, Cronan, and Leonard (2007). Issue-Contingent Ethical Views—A Comparison Using Pathfinder Associative Networks. Information Systems Education Journal, 5 (17). http://isedj.org/5/17/. ISSN: 1545-679X. (A preliminary version appears in The Proceedings of ISECON 2005: §3143. ISSN: 1542-7382.)