Electronic Commerce: An Alternative for Small Businesses Ghasem S. Alijani, Nnenna A. Amugo, Sam Eweni, J. Steven Welsh Southern University at New Orleans Graduate Studies Program in Computer Information Systems 6400 Press Drive New Orleans, LA 70126 Boumediene Belkhouche Tulane University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science New Orleans, LA 70118 Abstract Electronic commerce technology offers new opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises to extend their customer base in the global marketplace. One of the major technological challenges for many of these businesses is the lack of both information technology skills and knowledge about electronic commerce. Adopting electronic commerce can be difficult and without these needed skills and appropriate knowledge, businesses cannot make sound decisions for either daily or long-term operations. The purpose of this research was to investigate the success and failure rates of small businesses that engaged in electronic commerce by evaluating their sales performance. The data used included both the revenues from total sales and the electronic commerce portion of these revenues for the period of 1998-2001. Factors investigated included the year-to-year change in revenue and the percentage of total sales related to electronic commerce. Keywords: electronic commerce, business-to-business, business-to-customer, B2B, B2C 1. INTRODUCTION Electronic Commerce (E-commerce) is defined as the ability to perform transactions involving the exchange of goods or services between two or more parties using electronic tools and techniques (Economist 2000). In recent years, this technology has caused significant changes in how business is conducted in many organizations. E-commerce includes the functions of information exchange and commercial transaction over telecommunication networks linking partners. The concept originated in the form of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) on value-added networks with rigid and relatively complex specifications, and it tended to be imposed by large organizations upon their smaller suppliers (Raymond and Bergero 1996). This mutation in commercial relationships and transactions also happened within small and medium-sized enterprises (Bloch 1996). As Simon (1999) observed, small businesses are a special case, as they are often less structured and less formal with fewer fixed procedures. Many small businesses do not possess the technological background and information infrastructure that could enable them to operate more effectively or cost-efficiently (Poon and Swatman 1999). Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are large employers and their activities have had a profound impact on the economy (Bradford 2002). The World Wide Web offers exciting new opportunities for SMEs to extend their customer base into the global marketplace (OECD 1993). The reasons for the participation of small businesses in the electronic market are as varied as the businesses themselves (Fraser 2000). However, according to Auger and Gallaugher (1997), the primary drivers appear to include an affluent customer base, lower information dissemination costs, lower transaction costs, a broader market reach, and the opportunity to provide increased service through more readily available and timely consumer and market databases. On the negative side, small businesses must be concerned about issues such as controlling site usage, maintaining security, and gaining access to adequate and competitive business tools in order to generate return on their investments. Overall, small businesses do not seem to have a clear picture of Internet technology and its possible applications in business. 2. BACKGROUND Electronic commerce is a new way to conduct business that affects not only firms’ internal business activities, but also requires new kinds of coordination with clients and other institutions. Table 1 outlines the technology service architecture for E-commerce. This architecture serves as an organizing framework for the range of services that must be provided to support a company’s electronic commerce systems. In this framework, E-commerce applications involve six layers of information technology services: application services, brokerage and data management, interface services, secure messaging, middle-ware services, and network infrastructure. Table 1 Technology Architecture for Electronic Commerce E-commerce Technology Services Application Services - Business to consumer - Business to business - Internal business processes Data Management - Interactive order processing - Secure payment systems - Clearinghouses for virtual malls Interface Services - Interactive catalogs - Directory support functions - Software agents Secure Messaging - Secure hypertext transfer protocol - Encrypted E-mail and Electronic data interchange - Remote programming interface Middle-ware Services - Hypermedia document management - Web/legacy systems interface Network Infrastructure - The Internet, intranet, and extranet - Client/server and other networks Source: Management Information Systems by James A. O' Brien (4th ed. 1999 According to the Assistant Administrator for Technology for the U. S. Small Business Administration (SBA 2002), many small businesses are being formed specifically to address this newfound opportunity. Earlier, the SBA Office of Advocacy noted that, “Internet sales account for less than 1% of total retail sales in the U. S. economy” but “online retail marketing is showing about 200% annual growth” (SBA 1999). However, small businesses are often less structured and formal, with fewer fixed procedures and are less likely to have their own IT departments, with resident expertise (Simon 1999). According to a study done by the International Data Corporation (IDC, 2000), there were 7.2 million small businesses in the United States in 1997. Of these businesses, 78% owned at least one personal computer, of which 39% had access to the Internet. Significant numbers of small businesses started engaging in E-commerce in 1997, and gradually, the number of wired small businesses has more than doubled. Those that have adopted E-commerce enjoy higher revenues and faster growth than their counterparts. The average yearly revenue for all small businesses was approximately $2.7 million, but for those engaged in electronic commerce the average was about $3.8 million (IDC 1998). According to the Aberdeen Group (John 2000), 850,000 new small businesses are created each year and 66% of all new jobs are created in this sector. Small businesses account for 50% to 55% of all spending on indirect materials and services, including everything from computers to cleaning supplies. The SBA estimates that there are more than 25 million small businesses in the United States (SBA, 2002). However, the opportunities available on the Internet are not accessible to all possible users. Most small businesses are flexible and adapt to changes readily, but they also suffer from a lack of resources of various kinds. Many either do not possess the appropriate technological background or may not perceive the ways in which such an information infrastructure could enable them to operate their businesses more efficiently or cost-effectively. Technical problems concerning connectivity and owner/operator commitment are an important, if not critical, factor for success. These technical problems can become potentially insuperable barriers for small businesses wishing to use E-commerce for business activities and operations (Fuller and Jenkins 1995). However, these constraints have lessened through the substantial increase in the business activities of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and Internet Presence Providers (IPPs). Recent literature on training and development indicates the adequacy of technical skills as a preliminary barrier for increasing the use of E-commerce by small businesses. One research study conducted in Queensland focused on small businesses and more than 90% of the participants were the business owners. All participants believed that electronic commerce necessitated the expenditure of large amounts of money for the hardware, software, advice and skills development. Further study indicates that there is no clear understanding of the scale of costs involved or the potential return on investment (Bradford 2002). E-commerce innovations aim to reduce the cost of procurement before, during and after each transaction. However, search costs can be significant, relative to the value of the product, particularly for small purchases. Lehman Brothers found that a financial transaction costs $1.27 for a teller, $0.27 for an automated teller machine (ATM) and $0.01 online (Economist 2000). Average online brokerage fees have been reduced to less than $5, versus traditional discount brokerage fees exceeding $50. Therefore there is a significant potential decrease in costs for back-office operations and brokerage transactions financial exchanges. By lowering the costs of transactions, E-commerce will change not only operating costs but also the characteristics and scope of feasible transactions (Daniel 2000). 3. METHODOLOGY This study applied a data-driven approach and used the available data to identify variables for small business and E-commerce, its implementation, and factors leading to success and failure. Experts were chosen based on their knowledge and published opinions in books, academic publications, and trade or business journals. The period of the search was from 1998 through March 2003. However, the US Department of Commerce data for the year 2002 was not yet available. The information resources included three academic databases, a government site, and five industry online web databases as indicated below: * Dissertation Abstracts 1995 – 2003 * The ERIC Database 1995 – 2003 * Applied Science and Technology * Proquest database * Census.gov * Brint.com * Businessweek.com * Business2.com * Netobjects.com * Sba.gov The data set included the sales from traditional and electronic commerce for the same type of businesses in the same time period. A total of sixteen business types were investigated, focusing on business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) electronic commerce. The products were categorized into two main groups: durable and non-durable. Each category contained eight different types of businesses. Research Issues Examined Eight research issues were formulated and examined in this study: 1. What percentage of small businesses with Internet access had a Net presence, either a home page or web site? 2. What percentage of small businesses with Internet access actually engaged in E-commerce? 3. What percentage of the reviewed B2B small businesses, that sold durable goods, engaged in E-commerce and what was their success rate? Success is defined as an annual revenue increase. 4. What percentage of the reviewed B2B small businesses that sold non-durable goods was engaged in E-commerce and what was their success rate? 5. What percentage of the reviewed B2C small businesses that sold durable goods was engaged in E-commerce and what was their success rate? 6. What percentage of the reviewed B2C small businesses that sold non-durable goods was engaged in E-commerce and what was their success rate? 7. What percentage of all reviewed small businesses that sold both durable and non-durable goods was engaged in E-commerce? 8. What does an analysis, of all of the above, indicate about the types of businesses that are most suitable for E-commerce? Method of Analysis and Presentation A simple synthesized procedure was used to tally and evaluate the outcomes. Tables 2, 3, 6, and 7 were used to tabulate the data for the whole sale (B2B) types of businesses, while Tables 4, 5, 8, and 9 were used for the retail businesses (B2C). Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5 were used to tabulate the total sales and E-commerce sales for 1998 to 2001. Tables, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were derived using data from the previous tables to compute the percentage of revenue change for each type of business on an annual basis. This data was used to identify the year-to-year percentage revenue change for each type of business both for the total sales and E-commerce. 4. FINDINGS The data set related to businesses and electronic commerce was collected from the Census Bureau and the International Data Corporation web site. These facts were then synthesized and organized into tabular forms for analysis and presentation. Other information was then gathered from the Small Business Administration, in the form of white papers, and from expert academicians and industry practitioners. Outcomes of Processes Sixteen different types of businesses were investigated, focusing on business-to-business and business to consumer E-commerce types. These businesses were categorized into two main groups, based on the product or service provided: either durable or non-durable goods. Each category consisted of eight business types. Table 2 consists of the B2B revenue data collected for durable goods, 1998 to 2001. As stated above, the 2002 data should be available at a later date and contribute to future studies. As this table shows, motor vehicles and parts, computer hard and software, and electrical goods businesses utilized online business more than the others. Their online annual sales have been increasing steadily. Table 3 consists of the B2B revenue data collected for non-durable goods, 1998 - 2001. There is a steady increase in revenue sales from electronic commerce for the following types of businesses: books, clothing and medicine. Table 3 Small Businesses – Non-durable B2B (Total and E-commerce Sales) Product Value of Revenue 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non-durable Goods Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Paper and paper products 71217 1322 75034 2355 80054 3473 75516 3708 Drugs 124564 37705 146183 52197 168454 77790 201299 96754 Apparel 84190 3484 85677 7123 88922 10284 87362 11840 Groceries and related products 344437 N/A 360268 4856 381990 11435 395590 12101 Farm products 107993 N/A 101648 3196 107121 3228 107389 3356 Chemical and allied products 55073 N/A 55129 N/A 58976 N/A 59004 N/A Petroleum products 116397 N/A 136352 N/A 185911 N/A 180471 N/A Beer, wine/ alcoholic 61822 N/A 67384 N/A 71551 N/A 75274 N/A Miscellaneous 149655 N/A 158040 4508 175589 5033 176007 5116 Total non-Durable Goods 1115348 42511 1185715 74235 1318568 111243 1357912 132875 Overall total Wholesale trade (Table 2 & 3) 2434776 108382 2606617 187404 2788749 243724 2734936 270726 Source: U.S. Census Bureau Annual Trade Survey Table 4 consists of Retail revenue collected for Durable goods for the years 1998 through 2001. The available data indicates that consumers patronized more of the following types of businesses: motor vehicle and parts, furniture, computer software and electronics. Table 4 . Small Businesses – Durable goods B2C (Total and E–commerce Sales) Product Value of Revenue 1998 1999 2000 2001 Durable goods Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Motor vehicle and parts 699552 N/A 779981 1794 816902 4296 839971 5372 Furniture and home furnish. 78576 N/A 90705 288 96815 979 98052 1659 Building material 243494 N/A 264194 N/A 276533 447 288972 525 Computer Hardware N/A N/A 23016 4224 26462 6128 22134 5678 Computer Software N/A N/A 2670 768 3568 1107 3994 1208 Electronics and appliances N/A N/A 2611 464 3338 1080 3718 1448 Other merchandise N/A N/A 14776 947 15933 1863 16142 3062 Total Durable Retail Sales 1021622 N/A 1177953 8485 1239551 15900 1272983 18952 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Retail Trade Survey Table 5 shows B2C revenue for non-durable goods during 1998 - 2001. More consumers patronized the following type of businesses: medications, clothing and office equipment and supplies. Table 5 . Small Businesses – Non-durable B2C (Total and E–commerce Sales Product Value of Revenue 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non-durable Goods Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Food, Beer, Wine and Beverages 421578 N/A 442771 233 461976 566 483256 447 Drugs Health and personal care 130234 N/A 156807 232 171915 673 184412 952 Gasoline stations 191750 N/A 208908 N/A 246038 N/A 244664 N/A Clothing and accessories 149443 N/A 172548 914 182626 2313 182050 3619 Sporting goods 69459 N/A 73909 262 77673 400 79007 505 General merchandise 351799 N/A 382564 N/A 405978 N/A 429812 N/A Books and magazines N/A N/A 3480 1604 4115 1833 3864 1748 Music and videos N/A N/A 4335 809 4393 1186 3980 1318 Office equipment and supplies N/A N/A 7285 610 6936 1439 6454 1987 Toys and games N/A N/A 2255 398 3146 842 3035 929 Total Non-durable goods 1314263 N/A 1454862 5062 1564796 9252 1620534 11505 Source: U.S. Census Bureau Annual trade Survey Table 6 illustrates the year-to-year change in B2B revenue for durable goods, 1998 to 2001. This table was generated from Table 2 by calculating the difference in revenue change in total sales and E-commerce for each business. The table reveals that a higher percentage of small businesses selling durable goods are engaged in E-commerce. Table 6 Small Businesses Durable Goods B2B (Year to Year % Sales Change) Product 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Durable goods Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Motor vehicle and parts 13.2 25.4 1.8 8.3 1.8 10.0 Furniture and home furnishings 5.5 N/A 9.5 9.9 (5.0) 38.2 Construction materials 12.2 37.8 (0.9) 10.8 3.9 2.2 Professional/commercial equip. 8.0 49.2 (1.9) 28.5 (7.1) 0.2 Computer equipment / software 7.1 94.1 (6.9) 15.8 (19.2) (16.7) Electrical goods 11.4 136.9 15.4 25.5 (10.9) 11.3 Plumbing / heating equipment 5.0 36.5 5.8 1.2 (3.5) 8.5 Machinery equipment 0.8 N/A 3.2 6.9 3.6 4.7 Miscellaneous 7.7 300 9.5 37.7 (7.2) 9.5 Total durable goods 7.7 71.8 3.5 17.1 (6.3) 4.1 Table 7 shows the year-to- year revenue change in B2B for non-durable goods, 1998 through 2001. This table, generated from Table 3, evaluates the revenue change between the years, both in traditional and electronic commerce. By calculating the difference in revenue percentage change in total sales and E-commerce for each business, it is revealed that a higher percentage of these businesses are engaged in E-commerce more than in traditional commerce Table 7 Small Businesses Non-durable Goods B2B (Year to Year % Sales change) Products 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Non-durable goods Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Paper and paper products 5.4 78.1 6.7 47.5 (5.7) 6.8 Drugs 17.4 38.4 15.2 49.0 19.5 24.4 Apparel 1.8 104.4 3.8 44.4 (1.8) 15.1 Groceries and related products 4.6 N/A 6.0 135.5 3.6 5.8 Farm products (5.9) N/A 5.4 1.0 0.3 4.0 Chemical and allied products 0.1 N/A 7.0 N/A 0.1 N/A Petroleum products 17.1 N/A 36.3 N/A (2.9) N/A Beer, wine / alcoholic drinks 9.0 N/A 6.2 N/A 5.2 N/A Miscellaneous non-durable goods 5.6 N/A 11.1 11.6 0.2 1.6 Total non-durable goods 6.3 74.6 11.2 49.9 3.0 19.4 Overall total Wholesale Revenue (Table 2 & 3) 7.1 72.9 7.0 30.1 (2.0) 11.1 Table 8 illustrates year-to-year revenue changes in B2C durable goods during 1998 - 2001. This table was generated from Table 4, by calculating the difference in revenue percentage change in total sales and electronic commerce for each business. A sizeable number of consumers do business online from the comfort of their homes or offices. The percentage in revenue changes for E-commerce is much higher than that from traditional commerce, thus indicating a good success rate. Table 8 Small Businesses – Durable Goods B2C (Year to Year % Sales change). Products 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Durable goods Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Motor vehicle and parts 11.5 N/A 4.7 139.5 2.8 25.0 Furniture and home furnishings 15.4 N/A 6.7 240 1.3 69.5 Construction materials 8.5 N/A 4.7 N/A 4.5 17.4 Computer hardware N/A N/A 15.0 45.1 (16.4) (7.3) Computer software N/A N/A 33.6 44.1 11.9 9.1 Electronics and appliances N/A N/A 27.8 132.8 11.4 34.1 Miscellaneous N/A N/A 7.8 96.7 1.3 64.4 Total Durable goods Revenue 15.3 N/A 5.2 87.4 2.7 19.2 Table 9 consists of the year-to-year revenue changes in B2C non-durable goods for the years 1998 through 2001. This table was generated from Table 5, by calculating the difference in revenue percentage changes in total sales and E-commerce for each business. A high percentage of the businesses in non-durable goods engaged in E-commerce; the increase in revenue shows a high success rate in E-commerce. Only gas stations and general merchandise goods did not have available data. Table 9 Small Businesses – Non-durable Goods B2C (Year to Year % Sales change) Products 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Non-durable goods Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Total Sales E-C Food, Beer, Wine and beverages 5.0 N/A 4.3 143 4.6 (21.0) Drugs, Health and Professional care 20.4 N/A 9.6 190 7.3 41.5 Gasoline stations 8.9 N/A 17.8 N/A (0.6) N/A Clothing and accessories 15.5 N/A 5.8 153 0.3 56.5 Sporting goods 6.4 N/A 5.1 52.7 1.7 26.3 General merchandise stores 8.7 N/A 6.1 N/A 5.9 N/A Books and magazines N/A N/A 18.2 14.3 (6.1) (4.6) Music and videos N/A N/A 1.3 46.6 (9.4) 11.1 Office equipment and supplies N/A N/A (4.8) 135.9 (6.9) 38.1 Toys and games N/A N/A 39.5 111.6 (3.5) 10.3 Total Non-durable goods Revenue 10.6 N/A 7.6 82.8 3.6 24.4 Summary of Findings Eight research issues were formulated and examined in this research: * The first research issue was to identify the percentage of small businesses with online access that has an Internet presence. As Figure 1 shows, about 60% of small businesses with online access have a Net presence, either a homepage or a web site. * The second research issue was to find the percentage of small businesses with Internet access that were engaged in electronic commerce. Figure 1 shows that of the 60% of small businesses with online access, only about one-half sell goods online. * The third research issue was to find what percentage of B2B dealing with durable goods was engaged in E-commerce. Review of the available data (in Table 2) indicates that all the selected B2B types selling durable goods engage in E-commerce. The annual changes in total and E-commerce sales of this type of business shows Table 6. * The fourth issue was to identify what percentage of B2Bs, selling non-durable goods, was engaged in E-commerce. As Table 3 shows, about 67% of these type of businesses were using E-commerce. Table 7 depicts the annual changes in total and E-commerce portion of these types of businesses. * The fifth issue was to identify what percentage of B2C type businesses, selling durable goods, engaged in E-commerce. As Table 4 shows, the selected B2C types selling durable goods are more involved in E-commerce as Table 8 illustrates this through the annual sales changes. * The sixth issue was to identify the percentage of B2C type businesses, selling non-durable goods, were engaged in E-commerce. As Table 5 shows, only two of these business types were not involved in E-commerce during 1998-2001. Table 9 shows the annual changes of these type of businesses. * The seventh issue was to identify what percentage of all reviewed businesses was engaged in E-commerce. Of the 32 businesses reviewed, 27 or 84% had E-commerce revenue (Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5.) * The eighth issue was to synthesize all of the above to identify the businesses with the best E-commerce potential. The analysis revealed that not all businesses can readily adapt to E-commerce. The potentially successful E-commerce businesses are those with a steady annual increase in revenue with respect to the total sales changes. These businesses include all of those in the B2B and B2C types businesses that are selling non-durable goods. Figure 1: Access and Online Activities Finally, this study investigated the overall annual percentage changes in total and in E-commerce for B2B and B2C types. This includes the selling of both durable and non-durable goods. The results were presented in Figures 2 and 3 using the following acronyms: * TDS - Total Durable Sales * TNDS - Total Non-Durable Sales * TDEC - Total E-Commerce Sales * TNDEC - Total Non-Durable E-Commerce Sales As Figure 2 shows, the percentage of the changes in annual sales in E-commerce are much higher than percentage changes in total sales. Even during the 2000-01 period when there was a serious decline in total sales, the E-commerce portion managed to stay on the positive side. Figure 3 confirms the same results for B2C businesses. Figure 2: Annual Changes in B2B Businesses However, the lack of data in 1998-99 indicates that B2C businesses are more cautious in adopting this new approach. Figure 3: Annual Changes in B2C Businesses 5. CONCLUSIONS The purpose of this research was to investigate the success and failure rates of small businesses that engaged in electronic commerce by evaluating their sales performance. Based on the results reported, the study found that more businesses are adopting E-commerce each year and actively using the Internet to reach new markets. However, further analysis revealed that not all businesses can readily adapt to E-commerce environment and discover ways that it could enhance their businesses. The potentially successful E-commerce businesses are those with steady annual increase in revenue with respect to the total sales changes. These businesses include those in B2B type selling durable goods and the B2C type selling selective non-durable goods. Acknowledgements This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under the PESMaCT Grant HRD-0102620. 6. REFERENCES Auger, P. & Gallaugher, J. M., 1997, "Factors Affecting The Adoption of an Internet-based Sales Presence for Small Businesses." The Information Society, 13(1), 55-74. Bloch, M. & Segev, A, 1996, “The Impact of Electronic Commerce on the Travel Industry: An Analysis Methodology and Case Study.” Working paper, New York University. Bradford, & Darch, H. & Lucas, T, 2002, "Training as an e-Commerce Enabler.” Journal of Workplace Learning, 14, pp. 148-155. Daniel, F. S. & David, L, 2000 June, "Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. The Economist, 2000, April, 64-66. Fraser, J., Fraser, N. & McDonald, F, 2000, “The Strategic Challenge of Electronic Commerce.” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(1), 7-14. Fuller, T. & Jenkins, A, 1995, April, "Public Intervention in Entrepreneurial Innovation and Opportunism: Short Cuts or Detours to the Information Superhighway?" Babson Entrepreneurship Conference, London Business School, London. IDC, 1998, “Small businesses: Are They Ready for e-Commerce" [Online], Available: http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m3311/8_33/54115925/print.jhtml IDC, 2000, "E-commerce Market Forecasts" [Online], Available: http://www.nau.ie/surveys. John, F. I, 2000, November, "There’s No Business like Small Business." Upside publishing Company, Foster City. OECD, 1993, "Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Technology and Competitiveness." OECD publication services. Poon, S. & Swantman, P. M. C, 1999, "An Exploratory Study of Small Business Internet Commerce Issue." Information and Management 35(1) 9-18. Raymond, L. & Bergoeron, F, 1996, “EDI Success in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: a Field Study." Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 161-72. SBA, 1999, "E-commerce: Small Businesses Venture Online." U. S. SBA Office of Advocacy. SBA, 2002, “Strategies for Small Business Success,” U. S. Census Bureau. Simon, G, 1999, August, "E-commerce for Small Businesses" [Online], Available: http://www.simongrant.rg/pubs/iec99/small.html U. S. Department of Commerce, 2002, “E-Stats.” Census Bureau Annual Trade Survey. [Online], Available: http://www.census.gov/estats.